Archive for May, 2009

Call to action: Classical Forum Metal Section

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

Picture, for a moment, a classical forum on the internet. Since the internet attracts people who want to compensate for their failing egos, it’s a land of Kings with no castles. The classical forum amplifies this. Now they have a chance to really get falsely elitist and make everyone else feel bad not for not listening to classical, but for not listening to the right classical. It’s Soviet and hippie at once.

Now imagine this classical site has a metal forum, where Opeth and Dream Theater are seen as excellent and Demilich, Gorguts, Immolation and Morbid Angel are distorted pointless noise. Now imagine yourself going to this forum and trolling the hell out of these self-righteous pricks and showing them that even on the internet, a small man in real life is still a small man.

>>> HERE IS THE TARGET <<<

For trolling use only: Blame

Friday, May 22nd, 2009

Denial of the pervasive informational patterns in reality leads us to blame, resentment, and ultimately collapse. If you look out your window and see a collapsing civilization, here’s how to recognize the problem and fix it.

Blame

Call to action: Wiktionary logo

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

Notorious neurotic netards and pedophiles Wiktionary would like a new logo. In typical fashion, they have posted a rambling, neurotic statement requesting that we, the people(P.B.U.T.) of the intertard, submit to them some logos so they can prove how clever they are by rejecting them all and replacing them with a 48-point semicolon in the Garamond font, which is obviously wittier.

No proposals should be added to this page until 2009-05-19 00:01 to allow time for the wording of the following notes to be finalised.

This page is for nominations for the new Wiktionary logo vote. Each proposal should be added under a new section title with a short descriptive name. Logos from the previous vote can be included, and users are encouraged to design new ones. It does not have to be the author of the logo that proposes it, but this is likely to be more common for the newly created ones. The proposal should consist of:

* an image that is 135×135 px to be used as the logo
* either an image that is 16×16 px to be used as the favicon, or a short description of how such an image could be created.

After a proposal has been added, please abide by the following:

* Anyone may comment on or improve any proposal.
* The logo in the proposal may be replaced by an improved version of the same logo.
* Only one logo should be present in one section. Multiple similar proposals should have multiple sections.
* Do not vote on this page.

The proposals on this page should not be modified after 2009-07-31 23:59, voting (in a manner yet to be determined) will then occur.

I suggest one and only one principle: rape, rape, rape to rule. Sodomize their draft process, upload your favorite images (this is a democracy after all!!1!) and make sure they get their panties in knots for the next eight decades discussing whether to censor or not, when we all know they’ll just declare themselves Not Notable, stamp [Citation Needed] on their foreheads and die in a bizarre ritual suicide involving suet and nitrous oxide.

>>> HERE IS THE TARGET <<<